Back

Irwin Toyota

Laconia, NH

4.9
1,563 Reviews

59 Bisson Ave

Laconia, NH

03246

Directions

By Type

Showing 1,563 reviews

December 07, 2012

This will be the fourth car that I have purchased from Irwin's and each time my experience gets worse. From the lack of friendliness to the downright rudeness at times. The last car I purchased have to ha More

by nice_and_friendly
Customer Service
Quality Of Work
Friendliness
Price
Recommend Dealer
No
Employees Worked With
Gary, Steve, and Ralph
Dec 12, 2012 -

Irwin Toyota responded

I believe my GSM, Al Faro, spoke with you on Friday about delivery of your new Corolla that you bought on Tuesday night and that we didn't have in stock. It was explained to me that you were told we'd get the vehicle as quickly as possible. When you came on Thursday we hadn't secured the vehicle yet. Somehow (I'm not sure how/why) there was some kind of miscommunication--Understandable that you were upset. Al apologized for the miscommunication on Friday when he got in and and told you that we would continue to search for a vehicle. He also told you that we had an identical vehicle to what he was looking for on our allocation and it should be here between the 11th and the 14th and that we could hold that vehicle for you. When Al called you on Saturday he mentioned that the dealer was not willing to do paperwork or finalize the swap until Monday afternoon. We set the swap up for Tuesday morning. Al told you that he would call you when the vehicle was on its way. You called while he was in the Managers meeting and left a message. You called again just after the meeting and Al told you that the drivers were on the way and you would call him when the vehicle arrived. The vehicle arrived between 5:00 and 5:30. Ralph called you and told you that the vehicle was here, and we would be able to do the delivery on Wednesday. Ralph explained that he had checked with the Service Department and there was nobody there equipped to PDI the vehicle, and we would have to schedule delivery for Wednesday. We were able to call one of our techs at home who was willing to come in and PDI the Corolla. My apologies for the miscommication. That being said I feel like we exhausted all the possible avenues I know of to get you your vehicle as quickly as possible. Sorry for any inconvenience and please feel free to contact me on my cell 603 455 7477. Chris Irwin

December 06, 2012

My Experience with Irwin Motors was exceptional. They were very helpful and were able to answer all the Questions I had on the used Toyota at wholesale pricing I had seen on the internet. I was able to t More

by robert.nadeau3
Customer Service
Quality Of Work
Friendliness
Price
Recommend Dealer
Yes
Employees Worked With
Geoffrey Cunningham, Betty Ballantyne
August 16, 2012

BECAUSE I WAS SO DISHEARTENED BY MY EXPERIENCE, I SOUGHT TO CANCEL THE PAYMENT WITH TD BANK IN ORDER TO FORCE A RESOLUTION TO THE PROBLEMS DESCRIBED BELOW. I ALSO WANTED TO BE HEARD BY MANAGEMENT AS THE SE More

by dmcdermott1195
Customer Service
Quality Of Work
Friendliness
Price
Recommend Dealer
No
Employees Worked With
Dave
Aug 24, 2012 -

Irwin Toyota responded

This customer came into our Body Shop for an estimate on July 3, 2012 and attempted to get a better price from our Body Shop Manager on the price for the repairs--- whereas they had no insurance on the vehicle and were going to have to pay for the repairs out of pocket. The customer decided to have the vehicle repaired at another Body Shop in Belmont, NH instead of our Body Shop. They brought the vehicle into our service shop on July 6, 2012 for the rear brake lights staying on all the time and the horn would not shut off. The alarm system had activated due to the front end damage and ended up with a bad short in alarm system causing the horn to stay (one was damaged in the accident). We advised the customer that the aftermarket alarm system would need to be removed in order to fix the problem with the horn blaring. The customer paid us a $90 diagnostic fee on July 6, 2012 and proceeded to bring the vehicle to the Belmont Body Shop. On July 25, 2012, we received the vehicle back in our service department with this concern (per the customer’s own words)… “OWNER HAS REPAIRED FRONT END DAMAGE, TRY TO PUT BACK FUSES AND REPAIR ALARM SENSOR AND HORN” When we started diagnosing the vehicle, the horn relay and the brake light fuse were pulled out of the vehicle by the customer or the body shop. We diagnosed the brake light staying on concern to a bad brake light switch. We noted that the vehicle was driven here with no brake lights, whereas the brake light fuse was not even in the junction box. We removed the alarm system from the vehicle, per our previous diagnosis. Upon removal of the alarm system, we had the one horn that was damaged in the accident (which still worked a little bit, but not correctly) and the other horn that was inoperative completely. We proceeded to give the estimates for these items, the customer approved the repairs and we repaired the vehicles concerns for the alarm system issue, the brake light issue and the horns inoperative. The latch the customer is referring to should have been repaired during the body repairs and should not be blamed on our dealership. The only remote the customer had with him at the time of repairs was the aftermarket remote starter remote with power door lock control built in. The customer apparently found an old Toyota remote for the power locks, that probably had a dead battery in it from non-use, changed the battery and it worked fine. As stated before, the only remote we had access to was the aftermarket remote starter remote. When TD Bank called to verify if the repairs were done or not and were legitimate, we simply stated our side of the story. TD Bank sided with the repair facility. The Body Shop the vehicle was repaired at could not figure the issue out and brought it to us, which verifies how complicated the fix was. We have all pictures, documentation and repair orders to verify our story.

Aug 24, 2012 -

Irwin Toyota responded

This customer came into our Body Shop for an estimate on July 3, 2012 and attempted to get a better price from our Body Shop Manager on the price for the repairs--- whereas they had no insurance on the vehicle and were going to have to pay for the repairs out of pocket. The customer decided to have the vehicle repaired at another Body Shop in Belmont, NH instead of our Body Shop. They brought the vehicle into our service shop on July 6, 2012 for the rear brake lights staying on all the time and the horn would not shut off. The alarm system had activated due to the front end damage and ended up with a bad short in alarm system causing the horn to stay (one was damaged in the accident). We advised the customer that the aftermarket alarm system would need to be removed in order to fix the problem with the horn blaring. The customer paid us a $90 diagnostic fee on July 6, 2012 and proceeded to bring the vehicle to the Belmont Body Shop. On July 25, 2012, we received the vehicle back in our service department with this concern (per the customer’s own words)… “OWNER HAS REPAIRED FRONT END DAMAGE, TRY TO PUT BACK FUSES AND REPAIR ALARM SENSOR AND HORN” When we started diagnosing the vehicle, the horn relay and the brake light fuse were pulled out of the vehicle by the customer or the body shop. We diagnosed the brake light staying on concern to a bad brake light switch. We noted that the vehicle was driven here with no brake lights, whereas the brake light fuse was not even in the junction box. We removed the alarm system from the vehicle, per our previous diagnosis. Upon removal of the alarm system, we had the one horn that was damaged in the accident (which still worked a little bit, but not correctly) and the other horn that was inoperative completely. We proceeded to give the estimates for these items, the customer approved the repairs and we repaired the vehicles concerns for the alarm system issue, the brake light issue and the horns inoperative. The latch the customer is referring to should have been repaired during the body repairs and should not be blamed on our dealership. The only remote the customer had with him at the time of repairs was the aftermarket remote starter remote with power door lock control built in. The customer apparently found an old Toyota remote for the power locks, that probably had a dead battery in it from non-use, changed the battery and it worked fine. As stated before, the only remote we had access to was the aftermarket remote starter remote. When TD Bank called to verify if the repairs were done or not and were legitimate, we simply stated our side of the story. TD Bank sided with the repair facility. The Body Shop the vehicle was repaired at could not figure the issue out and brought it to us, which verifies how complicated the fix was. We have all pictures, documentation and repair orders to verify our story.

Sep 17, 2012 -

Irwin Toyota responded

This customer came into our Body Shop for an estimate on July 3, 2012 and attempted to get a better price from our Body Shop Manager on the price for the repairs--- whereas they had no insurance on the vehicle and were going to have to pay for the repairs out of pocket. The customer decided to have the vehicle repaired at another Body Shop in Belmont, NH instead of our Body Shop. They brought the vehicle into our service shop on July 6, 2012 for the rear brake lights staying on all the time and the horn would not shut off. The alarm system had activated due to the front end damage and ended up with a bad short in alarm system causing the horn to stay (one was damaged in the accident). We advised the customer that the aftermarket alarm system would need to be removed in order to fix the problem with the horn blaring. The customer paid us a $90 diagnostic fee on July 6, 2012 and proceeded to bring the vehicle to the Belmont Body Shop. On July 25, 2012, we received the vehicle back in our service department with this concern (per the customer’s own words)… “OWNER HAS REPAIRED FRONT END DAMAGE, TRY TO PUT BACK FUSES AND REPAIR ALARM SENSOR AND HORN” When we started diagnosing the vehicle, the horn relay and the brake light fuse were pulled out of the vehicle by the customer or the body shop. We diagnosed the brake light staying on concern to a bad brake light switch. We noted that the vehicle was driven here with no brake lights, whereas the brake light fuse was not even in the junction box. We removed the alarm system from the vehicle, per our previous diagnosis. Upon removal of the alarm system, we had the one horn that was damaged in the accident (which still worked a little bit, but not correctly) and the other horn that was inoperative completely. We proceeded to give the estimates for these items, the customer approved the repairs and we repaired the vehicles concerns for the alarm system issue, the brake light issue and the horns inoperative. The latch the customer is referring to should have been repaired during the body repairs and should not be blamed on our dealership. The only remote the customer had with him at the time of repairs was the aftermarket remote starter remote with power door lock control built in. The customer apparently found an old Toyota remote for the power locks, that probably had a dead battery in it from non-use, changed the battery and it worked fine. As stated before, the only remote we had access to was the aftermarket remote starter remote. When TD Bank called to verify if the repairs were done or not and were legitimate, we simply stated our side of the story. TD Bank sided with the repair facility. The Body Shop the vehicle was repaired at could not figure the issue out and brought it to us, which verifies how complicated the fix was. We have all pictures, documentation and repair orders to verify our story. Chris Irwin

May 25, 2012

I had certain parameters that a new-to-me used car needed to have. Working with Internet manager Tobias Paddock, I wasted no time finding a 2006 Toyota Avalon that was ultimately reasonably priced and provi More

by scrabbledupagain
Customer Service
Quality Of Work
Friendliness
Price
Recommend Dealer
Yes
Employees Worked With
Tobias Paddock, Ken Brace, Betty Ballantyne
April 05, 2012

Had plenty of time to make a purchase. Searched dealerships within 2 hour driving radius from my home. Irwin Toyota was our selection! Great deal! Great selection! Plus the Prius came with complime More

by mrhumanbeing
Customer Service
Quality Of Work
Friendliness
Price
Recommend Dealer
Yes
Employees Worked With
Steve Pouliot
March 27, 2012

Initially, I was contacted by one person and received some info on their stock. Then, a few days later, I was contacted by someone else who said HE was the person I should be talking to. Then the first More

by Kathie V. Davis
Customer Service
Friendliness
Price
Recommend Dealer
No
Employees Worked With
Jeff Wildoner
Apr 05, 2012 -

Irwin Toyota responded

Kathie- Thanks for your time on the phone. My apologies for the inconvenient experience. While it was bad timing with Aimee being out with sickness and the confusion with being handled by JW, it's still no excuse. It was our first Sunday open, however, the treatment that you and your husband were given was inappropriate. I'm glad you found a great Prius. Enjoy and if you or your husband ever need anything please don't hesitate to contact me directly. Chris Irwin Cell (603 ) 455 7477

February 22, 2012

Inspection service and repaired item which were noted needed attention in previous visit. Confident car is safe and I have an idea of items I need to watch. More

by marchi1
Customer Service
Quality Of Work
Friendliness
Price
Recommend Dealer
Yes
Employees Worked With
Bill Salta
February 20, 2012

Reviews Traded 08 Camry for 2012 model in Jan. Second Reviews Traded 08 Camry for 2012 model in Jan. Second time working with Glenn - very fair on trade-in & on pricing of new vehicle. We service our Toy More

by lrouts
Customer Service
Quality Of Work
Friendliness
Price
Recommend Dealer
Yes
Employees Worked With
Glenn Buehl
February 11, 2012

I took my car in for an oil change. I had scheduled an appointment. When I arrived, the man at the desk acknowledged me and stated that he would be with me shortly, as he finished up with another customer More

by gookins
Customer Service
Quality Of Work
Friendliness
Price
Recommend Dealer
Yes
Employees Worked With
Associates in Quick Lane
January 17, 2012

They replaced the complete frame in my 2005 Toyota Tacoma 4x4. I expected lots of rattles, trips back to the dealer, etc. but there have been NONE! They even replaced the rear springs as part of the process. More

by NewFRame
Customer Service
Quality Of Work
Friendliness
Price
Recommend Dealer
Yes
Employees Worked With
Dave Sealy, Ken Brace
...
135
...